Contents · 0% complete
Deduction, Exhaustion and Counterexample
A proof must work for every case, not just the ones you tried. Deduction uses algebra for a general case; exhaustion splits all possibilities into a few cases and checks each; and one single counterexample is enough to show a statement is false.
Learning objectives
- Write even, odd and consecutive integers algebraically.
- Prove a statement by deduction.
- Prove a statement by splitting into all possible cases.
- Disprove a statement with a counterexample.
is prime for . Is it prime for every positive integer ?
Core idea
, , : two odd numbers always seem to make an even number. But a thousand examples don't prove it for the next one. A proof covers every case at once by reasoning about a general number.
Deduction: start from known facts and reason step by step. Exhaustion: check every possible case. Counterexample: one failure disproves a claim.
1. Proof by deduction
- Even: . Odd: . Consecutive: , . ( an integer.)
Prove the sum of two odd numbers is even.
- Goal
- General proof.
- Strategy
- Represent with algebra.
- Two odd numbers (, integers; may differ).
- Add, factor 2.
- So the sum is integer: even ∎.
Prove for all integers .
- Goal
- Proof.
- Strategy
- Factorise.
- Factor.
- One of them is even, so the product is even ∎.
Prove for all real .
- Goal
- Proof.
- Strategy
- Complete the square.
- .
- Squares are non-negative ∎.
2. Exhaustion and counterexample
(a) Every square number ends in 0, 1, 4, 5, 6 or 9. (b) is prime for all positive integers .
- Goal
- Prove or disprove.
- Strategy
- (a) last digits are finite: check all. (b) look for a failure.
- A square's last digit depends only on the last digit.
- Counterexample.
Disprove: " is always prime."
Summary
- Algebraic representation.
- Exhaustion for finite cases.
- One counterexample disproves.
- Proof by deduction
- Logical steps from known facts.
- Counterexample
- A case where the claim fails.
Key formulae
Worked examples
Explore the graph
- The point shows for whole numbers .
- Step from upwards and test each value for primes:
- Which is the first that gives a non-prime? That single value disproves the claim.
A pattern that holds for a few cases can still fail.
Common mistakes
Checked it for . Proven.
One counterexample at and the whole claim collapses
Exam tip
Guided practice
Practice questions
More questions on every skill in this subtopic are in the question bank under Practise.
Challenge
Summary
- Even , odd ; different letters for independent numbers.
- Deduction: general algebra to the exact conclusion.
- Exhaustion: cover every case.
- One counterexample disproves a statement.
Quick quiz
Same topic, different board
- Specification
- 7357 A-level Mathematics
- Where
- Section A, Proof
- Expected
- The same methods, examined on Paper 1 and Paper 2.
- Calculator
- Permitted; some answers must still be exact.
- Typical style
- AQA mixes short multiple-choice questions with longer structured ones.
- Open in
- 7357 · Paper 17357 · Paper 27357 · Paper 3
Past paper questions
3 questions (15 marks) from real exams test this subtopic. Try each one under timed conditions, then mark it with the official mark scheme.
Proof by exhaustion about divisibility.
Counterexample about irrational numbers, and a proof about even numbers and multiples of 4.
Prove an inequality and give a counterexample.
Salam Academy original content · Content status: reviewed and published. Syllabus mapping: AQA 7357, First teaching 2017 (official specification).