Contents · 0% complete
Binomial and Poisson Hypothesis Tests
Assume nothing has changed (), then ask how surprising your observation would be. If the probability of a result at least that extreme is below the significance level, the evidence says something has changed.
Learning objectives
- Use the language of testing: , , significance level, one- and two-tailed, critical region.
- Carry out a binomial test by finding a tail probability.
- Carry out a Poisson test for a change in rate.
- Find a critical region and the actual significance level, and conclude in context.
A friend's coin lands heads times in throws. Is the coin biased? How unlikely would or more heads be with a fair coin?
Core idea
Toss a coin 20 times: 15 heads. Bad luck, or a biased coin? A hypothesis test asks: if the coin were fair, how surprising would 15 or more heads be? If it would be very surprising (say under 5%), we doubt fairness.
State (the default) and (what you suspect). Assume ; find the probability of the observed result or more extreme. If it's below the significance level, reject . Conclude in context, never with certainty.
1. The procedure
"Not rejecting" is not "proving" .
Claim ; 20 trials give 9 successes. Test at 5%.
- Goal
- Decision.
- Strategy
- Tail probability.
- Under .
- Observed or more extreme.
- Compare.
A shop averages 4 complaints a week; this week 9. Evidence of an increase at 5%?
- Goal
- Decision.
- Strategy
- .
- One-tailed.
- Tail.
Two-tailed 10% test: compare each tail with?
Summary
- , , level.
- Tail probability vs level.
- Conclude in context.
- Null hypothesis
- The default assumption.
- Critical region
- Values leading to rejecting .
Key formulae
Worked examples
Explore the graph
- The curve passes through for under . The shaded region (from ) suggests the upper tail .
- With , , , the tail is small: about .
- Lower until the tail is clearly more than . That is where would no longer be rejected.
A test asks: is the observed value out in the tail, where results are rare if is true?
Common mistakes
Comparing with 5%
Comparing with 5%: tail probabilities only
Exam tip
Guided practice
Practice questions
More questions on every skill in this subtopic are in the question bank under Practise.
Challenge
Summary
- : the usual parameter value; : what you suspect (one- or two-tailed).
- Find the tail probability in the direction of , assuming .
- Below the significance level: reject . Two-tailed: compare with half of it.
- Critical region: the values that lead to rejection; conclude in context.
Quick quiz
Same topic, different board
- Specification
- IAL Mathematics
- Where
- WST02 (binomial and Poisson tests) · WST03 (tests for a mean)
- Expected
- Binomial and Poisson tests (WST02), including critical regions and actual significance levels for one- and two-tailed tests.
- Calculator
- Permitted. Statistical tables are provided in the formula booklet.
- Typical style
- Often asks for the critical region and the actual significance level of a discrete test.
- Open in
- YMA01 · WST029MA0 · Paper 39FM0 · Option
Past paper questions
4 questions (28 marks) from real exams test this subtopic. Try each one under timed conditions, then mark it with the official mark scheme.
Binomial test for a proportion, and why a Poisson approximation does not suit.
Binomial test on the chance of rolling a six, then Type I and Type II error probabilities.
Binomial hypothesis test at 10%, and whether the model suits the context.
Type I error from a binomial test and a Type II error.
Salam Academy original content · Content status: reviewed and published. Syllabus mapping: Pearson Edexcel 9FM0, First teaching 2017 (official specification).