Parallel lines have equal gradients. Perpendicular lines have gradients that multiply to −1: flip the fraction and change the sign. With these two facts, plus one point, you can write down any related line.
Find the gradient of a perpendicular line using m1m2=−1.
Find the equation of a parallel or perpendicular line through a given point.
Find the perpendicular bisector of a line segment.
Pause and think
Rotate a line of gradient 2 (up 2, across 1) through 90∘. What happens to "up 2, across 1"?
Section 2 of 14
Core idea
Start hereRailway tracks and street corners
Railway tracks never meet: same direction, same gradient. Streets meeting at a corner turn through a right angle, and their gradients are linked in a surprising way: they multiply to −1.
The big idea
Parallel: equal gradients. Perpendicular: m1m2=−1, so m2=−m11.
1. The rules
y = 2x + 1, a parallel line, and a perpendicular line2×(−21)=−1. The perpendicular line meets y=2x+1 at a right angle.
Why perpendicular gradients multiply to −1
direction (1,m)
A line of gradient m: right 1, up m.
rotate 90∘:(−m,1)
Rotating (a,b) by 90∘ gives (−b,a).
gradient=−m1=−m1
Rise over run.
Worked exampleParallel to y=3x−1 through (2,8)
Equation.
Goal
Line.
Strategy
Same gradient; substitute.
1
m=3
Parallel.
2
8=6+c⇒c=2
Point.
Answery=3x+2.
✓ Check3(2)+2=8 ✓.
Worked examplePerpendicular to y=2x+1 through (4,1)
Equation.
Goal
Line.
Strategy
Negative reciprocal.
1
m=−21
−1÷2.
2
1=−2+c⇒c=3
Point.
Answery=−21x+3.
✓ Check2×(−21)=−1 ✓.
⚠️ Common misconceptionOnly the signPerpendicular to m=2 is −21, not −2.
🔍 Edge caseHorizontal and verticaly=3 (gradient 0) and x=2 (undefined) are perpendicular; the product rule doesn't apply.
Pause and think
Are y=4x and y=−41x+2 perpendicular?
Summary
Parallel: same m.
Perpendicular: −1/m.
Key words
Perpendicular
At right angles.
📜 HistoryEuclid's fifth postulate.Euclid's Elements (about 300 BC) assumed that, through a point not on a line, exactly one parallel line can be drawn. For 2000 years mathematicians tried to prove it from his other rules. In the 1820s Lobachevsky and Bolyai showed it cannot be: there are consistent "non-Euclidean" geometries where it fails, and one of them describes the curved space of Einstein's relativity.
🤯 Fun factRailway tracks meet at the horizon.Parallel railway lines appear to meet in the distance. Renaissance painters used this "vanishing point" deliberately to make flat paintings look three-dimensional; the mathematics of perspective was worked out by artists like Brunelleschi in the 1400s.
Keep reading for free
Create a free account to read the rest of this lesson: key formulae, worked examples, explore the graph, common mistakes, exam tip, guided practice and more. Your answers are checked and your progress is saved.